in 1945 USAF two-engine B-25 bomber crashed into the 79th floor of the 102-storey Empire State Building in Manhattan
The crash occurred during a misty night, and the damage was restricted to the impact area. When the plane crashed, one of its engines whizzed from the north wall, and through the south wall, ultimately landing on the roof of a nearby building. Debris from the building and plane also severed through elevator cables, and sent two cars and passengers into freefall. "We were horrified to see a B-25 half in and half out of the Empire State Building."
then on 9-11 the towers were hit then collapsed at freefall speed into a pile of dust ..
then wtc 7 not hit by a plane does the same thing …
HOW IS THIS POSSIABLE!
a 47-story high-rise not hit by an airplane) exhibits all the characteristics of a classic controlled demolition with explosives: (and some non-standard characteristics)
1. Rapid onset of “collapse”
2. Sounds of explosions at ground floor – a full second prior to collapse
3. Symmetrical “collapse” – through the path of greatest resistance – at nearly free-fall speed — the columns gave no resistance
4. “Collapses” into its own footprint – with the steel skeleton broken up for shipment
5. Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic dust clouds
6. Tons of molten metal found by CDI (Demolition Contractor).
7. Chemical signature of Thermate (high tech incendiary) found in slag, solidified molten metal, and dust samples by Physics professor Steven Jones, PhD.
8. FEMA finds rapid oxidation and intergranular melting on structural steel samples
9. Expert corroboration from the top European Controlled Demolition professional
10. Fore-knowledge of “collapse” by media, NYPD, FDNY
And exhibited none of the characteristics of destruction by fire, i.e.
1. slow onset with large visible deformations
2. Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, to the side most damaged by the fires)
3. Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel
4. High-rise buildings with much larger, hotter, and longer lasting fires have never “collapsed”.
————————————–…
9-11 needs a real investigation!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!…
1. Extremely rapid onset of “collapse”
2. Sounds of explosions and flashes of light witnessed near the beginning of the "collapse" by over 100 first responders
3. "Squibs", or focused explosions, 40 floors below the “collapsing” building seen in all the videos
4. Mid-air pulverization of 90,000 tons of concrete and steel decking, filing cabinets & 1000 people – mostly to dust
5. Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic dust clouds
6. Vertical progression of full building perimeter demolition waves
7. Symmetrical collapse – through the path of greatest resistance – at nearly free-fall speed — the columns gave no resistance
8. 1,400 foot diameter field of equally distributed debris – outside of building footprint
9. Blast waves blew out windows in buildings 400 feet away
10. Lateral ejection of thousands of individual 4 – 20 ton steel beams up to 500 feet
11. Total destruction of the building down to individual structural steel elements – obliterating the steel core structure
12. Tons of molten metal found by FDNY and numerous other experts under all 3 high-rises
13. Chemical signature of Thermate (high tech incendiary) found in slag, solidified molten metal, and dust samples by Physics professor Steven Jones, PhD.
14. FEMA finds rapid oxidation and intergranular melting on structural steel samples
15. More than 1000 Bodies are unaccounted for — 700 tiny bone fragments found on top of nearby buildings
And exhibited none of the characteristics of destruction by fire, i.e.
1. slow onset with large visible deformations
2. Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, intact, from the point of plane impact, to the side most damaged by the fires)
3. Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel
4. High-rise buildings with much larger, hotter, and longer lasting fires have never “collapsed”
abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=92525&…
I didn't know an Air Force B25 crashed into the Empire State Building.
I know an Army Air Corps B25 crashed.
What's to investigate. Liberals know that Bush did it.
yes – c1945/6
uk.youtube.com/watch?v=TwZ-vIaW6B…
uk.youtube.com/watch?v=e0d_KG7I6o…
The 9/11 documentary cannot be debunked – proof of explosions within the twin towers – every 15 to 20mins according to NYFD
uk.youtube.com/watch?v=8n-nT-luFI…
Because the architecture of the WTC was very different from that of the ESB.
The WTC, like all such modern skyscrapers, got more of its physical integrity from it's outer walls and less from the core.
This is what allowed modern skyscrapers, like the WTC, to have more usable floor space than older ones, like ESB. Thus making them more profitable.
Thus the WTC was more susceptible to catastrophic failure in the event of an incident like this.
I also suspect a twin engine B25 isn't all that comparable to the jetliner that hit the WTC.
But anyway.
A B-25 is a much smaller aircraft that the ones that struck the WTC, it carries a smaller fuel load. Add to that the different construction Technics (the empire State building is stronger that the WTC) your premise is incorrect. there are important differences you are not looking at.
Oh and that scientist you quote found evidence of sulfur, which he incorrectly attributed to Thermite. Sulfur is both a part of the smelting process and makes up part of the pollution of NYC.
